After the
paragraph in the Passover Haggadah about the five Rabbis reclining at a Seder
all night in Bnai Brak, the Haggadah quotes one of the five, Rabbi Elazar ben
Azaria who learned about the obligation of remembering the Exodus from Egypt
both day and night. But you may be puzzled what he meant when he said “I am
like a 70-year-old man…”
As the famous
American broadcaster Paul Harvey would say “Here is the rest of the story” for
today’s daf TB Berachot 28 (with a little bit from yesterday’s daf) fills in
the blanks.
When the masters of the shields entered, the questioner
stood before everyone present and asked: Is the evening prayer optional
or obligatory? Rabban Gamliel said to him: Obligatory. In order to
ascertain whether or not Rabbi Yehoshua still maintained his opinion, Rabban
Gamliel said to the Sages: Is there any person who disputes this matter?
Rabbi Yehoshua said to him: No, no one disagrees. In deference to the Nasi,
he did not wish to argue with him publicly (Tziyyun LeNefesh Ḥayya). Rabban
Gamliel said to Rabbi Yehoshua: But was it not in your name that they
told me that the evening prayer is optional? Rabban Gamliel said
to Rabbi Yehoshua: Yehoshua, stand on your feet and they will testify
against you. Rabbi Yehoshua stood on his feet and said: If I were alive and
the student were dead, the living can contradict the dead, and I could
deny issuing that ruling. Now that I am alive and he is alive, how can the
living contradict the living? I have no choice but to admit that I said
In the meantime, Rabban Gamliel, as the Nasi, was
sitting and lecturing, and Rabbi Yehoshua all the while was standing on
his feet, because Rabban Gamliel did not instruct him to sit. He remained
standing in deference to the Nasi. This continued for some time, until
it aroused great resentment against Rabban Gamliel, and all of the people
assembled began murmuring and said to Ḥutzpit the disseminator: Stop
conveying Rabban Gamliel’s lecture. And he stopped.
The Gemara relates that in their murmuring they said: How
long will Rabban Gamliel continue afflicting him? Last year on Rosh
HaShana, he afflicted him; Rabban Gamliel ordered Rabbi Yehoshua to come to
him carrying his staff and bag, on the day on which Yom Kippur occurred,
according to Rabbi Yehoshua’s calculations. Regarding the firstborn, in the
incident involving the question of Rabbi Tzadok, he afflicted him
just as he did now, and forced him to remain standing as punishment for his
failure to defend his differing opinion. Here too, he is afflicting him. Let
us remove him from his position as Nasi (the leader of the Jewish people in Palestine).
It was so agreed, but the question arose: Who shall we
establish in his place? Shall we establish Rabbi Yehoshua in his
place? The Sages rejected that option because Rabbi Yehoshua was party to
the incident for which Rabban Gamliel was deposed. Appointing him would be
extremely upsetting for Rabban Gamliel. Shall we establish Rabbi Akiva
in his place? The Sages rejected that option because Rabbi Akiva, who descended
from a family of converts, would be vulnerable. Perhaps due to Rabban
Gamliel’s resentment he would cause him to be divinely punished
as he lacks the merit of his ancestors to protect him.
Rather, suggested the Sages, let us establish
Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya in his place, his outstanding characteristics set
him apart from the other candidates. He is wise, rich, and a tenth
generation descendant of Ezra. The Gemara explains: He is wise, so if
Rabban Gamliel raises a challenge in matters of Torah, he will answer
it and not be embarrassed. And he is rich, so if the need arises to
pay homage to the Caesar’s court and serve as a representative of Israel to
lobby and negotiate, he has sufficient wealth to cover the costs of the long
journeys, taxes, and gifts, so he too is able to go and pay homage. And he
is a tenth generation descendant of Ezra, so he has the merit of
his ancestors, and Rabban Gamliel will be unable to cause him
to be punished. They came and said to him: Would the Master consent to being
the Head of the Yeshiva? He said to them: I will go and consult with my
household. He went and consulted with his wife. She said to him: There is
room for concern. Perhaps they will remove you from office just as they
removed Rabban Gamliel. He said to her, based on the folk saying: Let
a person use an expensive goblet one day and let it break tomorrow. In
other words, one should take advantage of an opportunity that presents itself
and he need not concern himself whether or not it will last. She said to
him: You have no white hair, and it is inappropriate for one so young to
head the Sages. The Gemara relates: That day, he was eighteen years old, a
miracle transpired for him and eighteen rows of hair turned white. The
Gemara comments: That explains that which Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya
said: I am as one who is seventy years old and he did not say: I am seventy
years old, because he looked older than he actually was.
If you want to know what
happened with Rabban Gamliel, Rabbi Yehoshua, and Rabbi Elazar go to https://www.sefaria.org/Berakhot.28a.1?lang=bi
and read on. There are a lot of life lessons to be learned from this chapter of
Jewish history.
No comments:
Post a Comment