Human nature never changes. We think that the grass is always greener on the other side of the fence. Daf TB Megillah 6 teaches that we should not compare what we have with somebody else’s.
“And the tribe of Zebulun was
resentful of its portion, as it is stated: “Zebulun was a people that
jeopardized their lives to the death” (Judges 5:18). What is the reason
for their resentfulness? Because “Naphtali was on the high places of the
field” (Judges 5:18).
“The verse
should be interpreted as follows: Zebulun said before the Holy One, Blessed
be He: Master of the Universe! To my brothers, the tribes whose territory
is adjacent to mine, You gave fields and vineyards, whereas to me You gave
mountains and hills; to my brothers You gave lands, whereas to me You gave seas
and rivers. God said back to him: Nevertheless, all will
need you due to the ḥilazon, the small sea creature residing in your
territory that is the source of the dye used in the ritual fringes [tzitzit].
As it is stated in Moses’ blessing to Zebulun: “They shall call the
people to the mountain: There they shall sacrifice offerings of
righteousness; for they shall suck of the abundance of the seas, and of the
hidden treasures of the sand” (Deuteronomy 33:19).
“Rav Yosef teaches about this: “Treasures”; this is
referring to the ḥilazon, which is found in the waters of
Zebulun. “Hidden”; this is referring to the tarit, a type
of sardine, which is also found in Zebulun’s coastal waters. “Sand”; this is
referring to the sand from which white glass is made. Zebulun said to
Him: All of these resources are indeed found in my territory, but Master
of the Universe, who will inform me if others take them without permission?
He said to the tribe of Zebulun: “There they shall sacrifice
offerings of righteousness.” This shall be a sign for you that anyone
who takes these items from you without making payment will not
prosper at all in his business.
“It is clear from the exposition of the
verse in Judges that the territory of Zebulun did not contain fields and
vineyards. And if it enters your mind to say that Kitron is Tzippori,
why was Zebulun resentful of his portion? Wasn’t Tzippori in his
territory, which was land that was vastly superior with regard to its
produce? And if you would say that Zebulun’s portion did not have
quality land flowing with milk and honey, didn’t Reish Lakish say: I myself
have seen the land flowing with milk and honey around Tzippori,
and it was sixteen mil by sixteen mil?
“And if you would say that the part of his territory that
flowed with milk and honey was not as vast as that of his brothers,
the other tribes, didn’t Rabba bar Ḥana say that Rabbi Yoḥanan said:
I myself have seen the land flowing with milk and honey over all
of Eretz Yisrael. And the size of the fertile land was like the
distance from Bei Kovei to the fortress of Tulbakni, a total of twenty-two
parasangs [parsa] in length and six parasangs in width. A parasang
is four mil; consequently, the area flowing with milk and honey around
Tzippori was four by four parasangs, which is more than the fair share of one
tribe among twelve.
“The Gemara answers: Even so, fields
and vineyards were preferable to Zebulun. The fertile land in Zebulun’s
territory is in a mountainous region, which makes it more difficult to
cultivate. The Gemara comments: The language of the verse is also precise
according to this explanation, as it is written: “And Naphtali was on the
high places of the field,” which indicates that Zebulun’s complaint was due
to the fact that Naphtali had fields. The Gemara concludes: Indeed, learn
from here that this is so.” (Sefaria.org translation)
Not only did Zebulun’s territory was rich with valuable resources, the ḥilazon, sardines, and white sand to make white glass, Zebulun’s
territory constituted 1/8 of all the land flowing with milk and honey.
Nevertheless, he coveted Naphtali’s portion
because it had fields and vineyards. Even God can convince him otherwise.
Many
of us are just like Zebulun. We can always find somebody who makes more money, has a bigger
house or owns even more than one house, drives fancier cars, and goes on better
vacations than we. If money and material goods made people truly
happy then there would be no genre of soap operas on television. The storylines
of all those soap operas revolve around the lives of the rich and superrich.
Nary has a poor person had a leading role and yet all those rich people have so
many problems and are so unhappy.
When we are not happy with what we have, then
what the other person possesses always looks better. Only when we place
ourselves in their position will we realize that everyone has their own set of
problems and difficulties. Ben Zoma hits the nail on the head when he
teaches: “Who
is rich? He who rejoices in his portion” (Avot 4:1)
No comments:
Post a Comment