We finish the 17th chapter of massechet Shabbat
with today’s daf TB Shabbat 126. The major sugiyah
under discussion actually begins on daf Shabbat 125b with the Mishnah. “With
regard to a window shutter, Rabbi Eliezer says: When it is tied to and
hanging (i.e. taut-gg) from
the window, i.e., it is not touching the ground, one may shutter the
window with it, because it is not considered building (which is one of
the 39 prohibited laborers-gg); and if not, i.e., it is touching the
ground, one may not shutter the window with it. And the Rabbis say:
Both in this case and in that case one may shutter
with it.” (Sefaria.org translation)
Before we begin our analysis, we have to recognize that
ancient windows are nothing like our modern windows. Our windows are made of plain
glass. Back in talmudic times a window was just a hole in the wall. At first
glance you might assume that the shutter in the Mishnah is closing a window in
the wall from the elements. You should know though every translation is a
commentary. Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz’s hides a disagreement between Rashi and his
grandson Rabbeinu Tam. Rashi contends that in the case of the extending a
temporary building (which the Gemara cites to gain clarity), only the roof makes
it a building. Consequently, our Mishnah is talking about a skylight! In the
tosefot Rabbeinu Tam disagrees and says that a wall makes a building. His proof
is a Sukkah, which by very definition is a temporary building, only up seven
days. One is not permitted to add the required third wall to make a kosher
sukkah on Shabbat or on a festival. One may add a fourth wall because it is
only optional. Consequently, our Mishnah is describing a window in a wall. Now
you can plainly see that Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz accepts the grandson’s
interpretation over the grandfather’s! A younger generation can still teach an
older generation a lot, if we would only listen.
We know that Rabbi Eliezer’s position is clear. The shutter
needs to be tied and taut. The Rabbi’s position in the Mishnah needs
clarification. “We learned in the mishna that the Rabbis say: Both in this case
and in that case one may shutter with it. The Gemara asks: What is the
meaning of: Both in this case and in that case, in
this context? Rabbi Abba said that Rav Kahana said: Both if it is
tied and if it is not tied it is permitted, and that is
only if it is prepared for this purpose beforehand.” (Sefaria.org
translation) if Rabbi Eliezer’s position is very stringent, then according to
Rabbi Abba and Rav Kahana the sages position is very lenient. All one has to do
before Shabbat is designated the shutter’s purpose so it is no longer muktzeh
on Shabbat. Rabbi Yirmeya tells Rabbi Abba that he makes the sages position too
lenient. By using a baraita as an analogy, he claims that “And let the
Master say it in this way: Both if it is hanging and if it is not
hanging, and that is only if it is tied…” (Sefaria.org translation)
According to this interpretation the sages teach that the shutter needs to be
attached and tied to the window, but not taut to lose its muktzeh status and be
used on Shabbat.
Rabbi Abba response by using a different baraita to prove
that his interpretation is correct. “Rabbi Abba said to Rabbi Yirmeya: It
is I who say that this case is in accordance with the opinion of this
tanna, as it was taught in the Tosefta: With regard to a
reed that the homeowner installed to open and lock the door with it
like a bolt, when it is tied and hanging in the entrance, one may open and
lock the door with it on Shabbat, and when it is not tied and
hanging, one may not open and lock the door with it. Rabban Shimon ben
Gamliel says: If it was prepared for that use, it is permitted to
use it even if it is not tied. There is an opinion that holds that a
bolt need not be attached, and preparation is sufficient to permit its use.” (Sefaria.org
translation) The tanna kama is Rabbi Eliezer and Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel’s position
is analogous with the sages. All one needs to do is designate that you’re going
to use the shutters on Shabbat to remove its muktzeh’s status.
So what is the halkhah? “Rav Yehuda bar Sheilat said
that Rav Asi said that Rabbi Yoḥanan said: The halakha
in this case is in accordance with the opinion of Rabban Shimon ben
Gamliel (and the sages in our
Mishnah-gg).” (Sefaria.org translation)
No comments:
Post a Comment