The Mishnah on daf TB Baba Batra 84 reopens the topic when a person acquires an object. Obviously before the item is sold, both the seller and the buyer have to have the same mind about the object. The seller wants to sell it and the buyer wants to buy it. Nevertheless, handing over the money of the agreed purchase price is insufficient for the buyer to actually acquire the item. The buyer has to do an act of acquisition.
“This mishna
discusses several methods of acquiring movable property. With regard to one
who sells produce to another, if the buyer pulled the produce but
did not measure it, he has acquired the produce through the act of
acquisition of pulling. If he measured the produce but did not pull
it, he has not acquired it, and either the seller or the buyer can
decide to rescind the sale. If the buyer is perspicacious and
wants to acquire the produce without having to pull it, and he wishes to do so
before the seller could change his mind and decide not to sell, he rents its
place, where the produce is located, and his property immediately effects
acquisition of the produce on his behalf.” (TB Baba Batra 84b, Sefaria.org
translation)
Because this
Mishna is too vague, the Gemara litigates where the selling takes place and
when the buyer’s vessel acquires the produce. First of all, everybody agrees
that when the transaction happens in the public domain, the buyer’s vessel
doesn’t automatically acquire the item that is put into it. “A person’s
vessels effect acquisition of any item placed inside them for him, in
any place in which they are situated, except for the public domain.”
(TB Baba Batra 85a, Sefaria.org translation) Rashbam explains that the basket
in the public domain creates a public hazard as people may trip over it;
consequently, it has no right to be there.
When the buyer’s basket is in a neutral territory like an alleyway or court your where neither the buyer nor the seller own, the buyer’s vessel effects the acquisition of the goods. “Rabbi Asi says that Rabbi Yoḥanan says: If the seller measured the produce and placed it in an alleyway, which is not the public domain but a location where people can keep their belongings, then even if the buyer did not pull the produce, he acquires it..” (TB Baba Batra 84b, Sefaria.org translation) Rashbam explains the buyer can temporarily acquire the land upon which the basket sits and that spot acts like a kinyan khazarot (קנין חצרות).
Obviously when the buyer’s basket is in the buyer’s domain, the items in the basket belong to the buyer.
What happens
when the buyer’s basket is in the seller’s domain? This question is never
definitively answered. One position asserts that my vessel actually can acquire
the items put in it even in the seller’s domain. The other position argues that
the vessel status becomes subsumed or nullified by the larger sellers domain.
Halkhically, it is as if not my vessel at all. The only time the buyer’s vessel
can definitely acquire the items put into it in the sellers domain is when the
seller says, “Go and acquire it.” “Ravina said to Rav Ashi: Come and hear
a resolution, as Rav and Shmuel both say: A person’s vessel effects
acquisition for him of any item placed inside it, in any place that
it is situated. What is added by the phrase: In any place? Does it not
serve to add the domain of the seller? Rav Ashi answered: There,
it is referring to a specific case, where the seller said to him: Go
and acquire it. In that situation, the buyer does acquire the
merchandise. This does not refer to a standard case where the buyer’s vessels
are located in the domain of the seller.” (Sefaria.org translation)
The Gemara
goes on to teach us other rules of acquisition. Ҥ We learned in a
mishna elsewhere (Kiddushin 26a): Property that is guaranteed,
i.e., land, is acquired by means of money, or by means of a
bill, or by taking possession of it. And property that does not
have a guarantee, i.e., movable property, can be acquired only by
means of pulling. In Sura they taught this following halakha in
the name of Rav Ḥisda, while in Pumbedita they taught it in the name of
Rav Kahana, and some say in the name of Rava: They taught that movable
property is acquired by means of pulling only with regard to items
that are not typically lifted due to their weight or for some other reason.
But in the case of items that are typically lifted, then yes,
they are acquired by means of lifting, but they are not
acquired by means of pulling.” (Sefari.org translation)
The rabbis
made an exception with small domesticated animals. You might think that small
domesticated animals need to be lifted in order to acquire them. “Domesticated
animals are different, as they cling to the ground and it is difficult to
lift them. Therefore, the usual manner of moving animals is to pull them.” (Sefaria.org
translation) Because these animals are difficult to hold even though they are
light enough to pick up, the rabbis decreed leniently a person may acquire them
through pulling.
No comments:
Post a Comment