A person made a vow; however, he no longer wants it to be in force. Today’s daf TB Nedarim teaches who may annul a person’s vow (מתיר נדרים). The Gemara provides two different methodologies to arrive at the same answer
The first method employs a gezerah shavah, a clarification based on identical words or terms in a biblical text.
“It is taught in a baraita: It is stated here, with regard to
vows: “This is the thing (זֶה
הַדָּבָר),” and it is stated elsewhere: “Speak to Aaron, and to his sons, and to all the children of Israel, and
say to them: This is the thing (זֶה הַדָּבָר) which the Lord has commanded, saying” (Leviticus 17:2), in the
verse introducing the prohibition against slaughtering offerings outside
of the Temple courtyard. Just as with regard to offerings slaughtered
outside the Temple courtyard, the verse is directed to Aaron and his
sons and all of Israel, so too, the portion in the Torah about
vows is directed to Aaron and his sons and all of Israel. And
just as here, with regard to vows, the verse states: “And Moses spoke to the
heads of the tribes of the children of Israel” (Numbers 30:2), so too,
there, with regard to offerings slaughtered outside the Temple courtyard,
Moses spoke to the heads of the tribes.
The Gemara
asks: With regard to the Torah portion on vows, for what halakha
is the verbal analogy between it and slaughtering offerings outside the Temple
courtyard taught? Rav Aḥa bar Ya’akov says: The verbal analogy is the
source to authorize three laymen to dissolve vows. The Gemara raises a
difficulty: But isn’t it written: “The heads of the tribes”? Rav Ḥisda said,
and some say it was Rabbi Yoḥanan: From the phrase “the heads of the
tribes” the Sages derive that vows can also be dissolved by a single expert.” (Sefaria.org
translation)
The Ron explains that the Gemara learns that three laypeople may dissolve a vow from the gezerah shavah. The verse concerning vows containing the phrase “The heads of the tribes” teaches that a single expert may dissolve a vow as well. The Ron explains why the number three when comes to laypeople. These laypeople are acting like a court (בית דין) and the minimum amount of judges in a court is three.
All this is well and good except Beit Shammai does have this gezerah shavah. “Beit Shammai do not have a tradition of interpreting the verses in accordance with this verbal analogy.” (Sefaria.org translation) Note parashat Pinkhas which contains the description of the holidays is followed by parashat Matot which contains the laws of vows.
“Rav Sheshet said to him: This
is what Rabbi Yosei HaGelili’s statement in the baraita is
teaching: Festivals of the Lord require sanctification by the court,
as the Festival dates are established by the court’s determination of the New
Moon, whereas Shabbat, which commemorates Creation, does not require
sanctification by the court. Shabbat is sanctified every week independent
of any court decision.
“As for ben Azzai’s statement, it should
be understood as follows: The Festivals of the Lord require an expert,
as the start of the month, which is dependent upon the appearance of the new
moon, which in turn determines the Festivals, can be established only by a
court composed of experts. But the portion on vows does not require an
expert, i.e., vows can be dissolved even by a court of laymen.
This explanation of the baraita given to Rav Asi bar Natan also serves
to explain Beit Shammai’s source for the halakha that three laymen can
dissolve vows.
“The Gemara raises a difficulty: But
in the portion on vows the phrase “the heads of the tribes” (Numbers
30:2) is written. How, then, can it be said that vows can be dissolved
by laymen? Rav Ḥisda said, and some say it was Rabbi Yoḥanan: From
“the heads of the tribes,” the Sages derive that vows can be dissolved by a
single expert by himself, but three laymen also have that ability.” (Sefaria.org
translation)
To sanctify the new month witnesses of
the new moon have to appear before a court of experts to determine whether or
not they actually saw the new moon. Once the new moon is determined, the
holidays follow in their natural course. In contrast three laypeople may
dissolve a vow. Bet Shammai learns that one expert can dissolve a vow just like
we did above in the interpretation of “the heads of the tribes”
The bottom line either one expert or
three laypeople may dissolve a vow (מתיר נדרים).
No comments:
Post a Comment