The Mishnah on yesterday’s daf TB Eruvin 58b teaches us an important lesson that applies to this upcoming election. “MISHNA: One may measure the Shabbat limit only with an expert surveyor. If it is discovered that the surveyor extended the limit in one place and reduced it in another place, so that the line marking the Shabbat limit is not straight, one accepts the measurement of the place where he extended the limit and straightens the limit accordingly. Similarly, if the surveyor extended the limit for one and reduced it for another, one accepts the extended measurement.
“And furthermore, even a gentile slave and even a gentile maidservant, whose testimonies are generally considered unreliable, are trustworthy to say: The Shabbat limit extended until here; as the Sages did not state the matter, the laws of Shabbat limits, to be stringent, but rather to be lenient. The prohibition to walk more than two thousand cubits is rabbinic in origin and is therefore interpreted leniently.” (Sefaria.org translation)
Today’s daf TB Eruvin 59 seemingly
challenges my conclusion of a couple days ago that we are lenient when deciding arguments revolving around the Shabbat tekhum. The Mishnah teaches if two
surveyors come up with two different calculations of the Shabbat tekhum or one surveyor comes up with two different calculations and the
calculations are not significantly different, we rely upon the larger calculation.
This lenient conclusion is challenged in the Gemara. “We learned
in the mishna: As the Sages did not state the matter, the laws of Shabbat
limits, to be stringent, but rather to be lenient. The Gemara
asks: Wasn’t the opposite taught in a baraita: The
Sages did not state the matter, the laws of Shabbat limits, to be
lenient but rather to be stringent?” (Sefaria.org translation) Knowingly and willingly violating the Shabbat
is a capital offense according to the Torah. Consequently, it could make sense
to be strict when measuring the Shabbat limit lest somebody walk farther and
transgress the Sabbath.
The answer is simple. “Ravina said that there is no contradiction between these two statements: The
very institution of Shabbat limits was enacted not to be more lenient
than Torah law, but rather to be stringent beyond Torah law.
Nonetheless, since Shabbat limits are rabbinic law, the Sages permitted
certain leniencies with regard to how the Shabbat limits are measured.” The Torah
mandates no limit to how far a person may walk on Shabbat. The 2000 amot limit is a stringency imposed by
the rabbis. But since Shabbat limits are rabbinic in nature, the sages
permitted leniency’s with regard how they are measured.
No comments:
Post a Comment