TB daf Menakhot 98 records the disagreement between Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi and Rabbi Shimon concerning the placement of the menorah in the Temple’s courtyard. Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi held that the long end of the menorah ran east to west while Rabbi Shimon held that it ran from North to South. Each sage interpreted the same verse differently.
Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi reasoning: “The Gemara asks: And with regard to the Candelabrum
itself, from where do we derive that it was positioned from east to west?
This is derived from the fact that it is written with regard to the
western lamp of the Candelabrum: “Outside the Curtain of the testimony, in
the Tent of Meeting, Aaron shall set it in order, to burn from evening
to morning before the Lord continually” (Leviticus 24:3). The phrase
“shall set it in order” is written in the singular, referring only to the
western lamp.
“The Gemara
explains: One can infer from the fact that the verse states that the
western lamp is set “before the Lord,” i.e., before the Holy of Holies, that
the location of all the other lamps of the Candelabrum is not
considered “before the Lord,” as they are not situated in the same
proximity to the Holy of Holies. This would be the case only if the Candelabrum
was positioned from east to west. But if it enters your mind to say that
the Candelabrum was positioned from north to south, then all
the other lamps should also be considered “before the Lord,” as
all the lamps are an equal distance from the Holy of Holies.” (Sefaria.com translation)
Rabbi Shimon’s reasoning: “The Gemara replies that according to Rabbi Elazar, son of
Rabbi Shimon, the term “before the Lord” means that the wick of the middle lamp
is turned toward the Holy of Holies, as the priest who kindles the lamps turns
the wicks of the other lamps slightly to the side, whereas the wick of
the middle lamp is turned directly toward the Holy of Holies.
"This is as it is taught in a baraita: The verse states: “When you light the lamps, the seven lamps shall give light toward the front of the Candelabrum” (Numbers 8:2). This teaches that the priests would turn the front of each lamp toward the middle lamp, but the middle lamp was turned toward the Holy of Holies.” (Sefaria.com translation)
At this
juncture Rabbi Natan makes an observation based upon Rabbi Shimon’s reasoning
which is my Torah tidbit today. “Rabbi Natan says: One can infer from
here that the middle position is preeminent.” (Sefaria. com
translation) When we read the Torah on Mondays and Thursday a minimum of 10
verses are divided into 3 aliyot. That means that 2 aliyot contains 3 verses
and one contains 4 verses. But which one contains more verses, the first,
second, or third aliyah?
Rashi ד"ה אל מול פני המנורה comments “From here we infer that the
middle position is commendable - regarding three that read Torah on Mondays and
Thursdays, and we say in Megillah 21b: "we do not read any less than ten
verses. And Rabbi Yochana says: the middle [alyiah] is preferable, and that is
four verses, and the others are three and three.” (Sefaria.org translation)
Tosafot raises
a difficulty with Rashi’s explanation. “The middle is preferable. And the
explanation of the book [Rashi] is regarding that we read the Torah that we do
not read any less than ten verses, and the middle reads four verses, being
preferable. And regarding this he brings the baraita there, in the third
chapter of Megilah (Megilah 21b) but it is difficult - because they bring also
other baraitot, that affirm that the first and the last [alyiot] are preferable
[as well].” (Sefaria.org translation)
In the end
the first aliyah for Mondays and Thursdays as well as on Saturday afternoon is
divided into three portions with breaks that make the most sense. The only
caveat is each aliyah must contain a minimum of three verses.
No comments:
Post a Comment