The Mishnah on today’s daf TB Avodah Zarah 62 differentiates between wages for work solely in conjunction with yayin neskh and work that may include yayin neskh.
“In the case
of a gentile who hires a Jewish laborer to work with wine used
for an idolatrous libation (yayin neskh -gg) with him, his
wage is forbidden, i.e., it is prohibited for the Jew to
derive benefit from his wage. If the gentile hired him to do other work with
him, even if he said to him while he was working with him: Transport the
barrel of wine used for a libation for me from this place to
that place, his wage is permitted, i.e., the Jew is permitted to
derive benefit from the money. With regard to a gentile who rents a
Jew’s donkey to carry wine used for a libation on it, its rental fee
is forbidden. If he rented it to sit on it, even if a gentile placed
his jug of wine used for a libation on it, its rental fee is permitted.”
(Sefaria.org translation)
The Gemara
challenges this distinction by bringing the case of produce of the Sabbatical
year. “perhaps the reason that the wage is forbidden is since the wine
used for a libation transfers to the money its status as an
object of idol worship. The Gemara challenges: But there is the halakha
of Sabbatical-Year produce, which transfers its sanctity to the money
with which it is redeemed, and yet we learned in a mishna
(Shevi’it 8:4): With regard to one who says to his laborer
during the Sabbatical Year: Here is this dinar I give to you; gather
for me vegetables for its value today, his wage is forbidden,
i.e., the sanctity of the Sabbatical-Year produce is transferred to the wage,
since it is as though he has purchased Sabbatical-Year produce in exchange for
the dinar. But if the employer says to him: Gather for me vegetables today,
without mentioning that it is for the value of the dinar, his wage is permitted,
as he merely paid him for his labor. This should apply as well to the case of
the wine used for a libation.” (Sefaria.org translation)
Rabbi
Yokhanan teaches that the rabbis penalized work done solely in conjunction with
yayin nesekh. These wages are prohibited. At the end of the sugiyah the Gemara says this penalty is
due to the severity of the sin of idolatry, “the stringency of wine used
for a libation is different, and it is treated more stringently than
Sabbatical-Year produce.” (Sefaria.org translation)
In the next sugiya we learned that the rabbis treat stam yanam exactly like yayin nesekh.
No comments:
Post a Comment