Today’s daf TB Sanhedrin 88 discusses the court system in which determines whether the scholar is indeed a rebellious scholar. There is a hierarchy of courts. The closer the court of 23 is to Jerusalem, the greater the court is. The highest court is the Sanhedrin of 73 which is located in the Chamber of Hewn Stone.
“If the matter was unclear and it was
necessary to ask and clarify it, those uncertain of the halakha
would ask the court that is in their city. If the members of the court heard
a clear halakhic ruling with regard to that matter, they said it to
them, and if not, they would come to a court that is adjacent to
their city. If the members of the court heard a clear halakhic
ruling with regard to that matter, they said it to them, and if not,
they would come to the court at the entrance to the Temple Mount. If
the members of the court heard a clear halakhic ruling with regard to
that matter, they said it to them, and if not, they would come
to the court at the entrance to the Temple courtyard.
“And the elder whose ruling deviated from the
ruling of his colleagues says: This is what I interpreted and that
is what my colleagues interpreted; this is what I taught and that
is what my colleagues taught. If the members of the court heard a
clear halakhic ruling with regard to that matter, they said it to
them, and if not, these judges and those judges would come to the
Chamber of Hewn Stone, where the Sanhedrin would be convened from
the time that the daily morning offering is sacrificed until the
time that the daily afternoon offering is sacrificed.
"And on Shabbatot
and Festivals, when court is not in session, the members
of the court would sit at the rampart. When a question was asked
before them, if the members of the court heard a clear halakhic
ruling with regard to that matter, they would say it to them, and if
not they would stand for a vote on the matter. If the judges who deemed
the item in question ritually impure outnumbered those who deemed it
pure, the court would deem the item impure. If the judges who
deemed the item in question ritually pure outnumbered those who
deemed it impure, the court would deem the item pure.”
(Sefaria.org translation)
The Gemara then defines the qualities a judge should
process. “The baraita
continues its discussion of the workings of the Sanhedrin: From there,
the Sanhedrin writes and dispatches the following statement to all
places: Anyone who is wise and humble and the minds of people are at ease with
him shall be a judge in his city. If he is successful in his city, from
there, they promote him to the court at the entrance to the Temple Mount
if there is a vacant seat on the court, and from there they promote him
to the court at the entrance to the Temple courtyard, and from
there to the court in the Chamber of Hewn Stone.”
(Sefaria.org translation)
With a low
opinion the majority of Americans have of the Supreme Court justices, I doubt
whether the many can truly be described as wise and humble and the minds of people are at ease with him. And that is
a shame.
Let me add that these are qualities all public servants as well as all
people should strive to have.
No comments:
Post a Comment