Tuesday, December 24, 2024

The difference between a good judge and a bad judge TB Sanhedrin 7

The Supreme Court’s approval rating is at an all-time low. “A new poll shows that Americans are overwhelmingly dissatisfied with how the Supreme Court currently functions, with a large swath of respondents changing their views on the institution over the past year.

“The Marquette Law School poll, conducted on July 5-12, found that most Americans do not approve of how the Supreme Court has functioned over the past year. Just 38 percent of respondents said that they approve of the Court’s recent actions, while 61 percent said that they disapprove. (https://truthout.org/articles/poll-finds-approval-of-supreme-court-down-22-points-over-past year/?gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiA1Km7BhC9ARIsAFZfEIvVu8xsXzI5_yKGDp1ACqCkb8TNKb5MWyQMNE95_DKIDC7hP968wXEaAtNkEALw_wcB)

Today’s daf TB Sanhedrin 7 should be studied and reviewed over and over again not only by the Supreme Court justices, but all judges. The following are some appropriate selections all translated from Sefaria.org

Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥmani says that Rabbi Yonatan says: Any judge who judges a judgment according to absolute truth [emet] causes the Divine Presence to rest among Israel, as it is stated: “God stands in the congregation of God; in the midst of the judges He judges” (Psalms 82:1), indicating that the Divine Presence is in the midst of the court. And every judge who does not judge a judgment according to absolute truth causes the Divine Presence to withdraw from Israel, as it is stated: “For the oppression of the poor, for the sighing of the needy, now will I arise, says the Lord” (Psalms 12:6). God will arise and leave the people as a result of oppression.

And Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥmani says that Rabbi Yonatan says: With regard to any judge who takes disputed property or money [mamon] from this litigant and gives it to that other litigant unlawfully, the Holy One, Blessed be He, takes his soul from him as punishment for his corruption, as it is stated: “Rob not the weak, because he is weak, neither crush the poor in the gate; for the Lord will plead their cause and despoil of life those who despoil them” (Proverbs 22:22–23). God cautions that He will take the life of one who steals from the poor at the gate, meaning in the courtroom, as the city gate was the traditional site of the community’s court. “And Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥmani says that Rabbi Yonatan says: A judge should always view [yireh] himself as if a sword is placed between his thighs, so that if he leans to the right or to the left he will be injured, and as if Gehenna is opened up beneath him, as it is stated: “Behold, it is the bed of Solomon; sixty mighty men are around it, of the mighty men of Israel. They all handle the sword, and are expert in war; every man has his sword upon his thigh due to dread in the night” (Song of Songs 3:7–8). The words “due to dread in the night” mean due to the dread of Gehenna, which is similar to the night. Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥmani interprets this verse as referring to judges, who are called: Mighty men of Israel, as they preside in the Temple, which is termed: The bed of God. In this verse, God is referred to as: Solomon [Shlomo], the King to Whom peace [shalom] belongs.”

I’m not looking forward when Trump has the ability to appoint more judges. “Donald TrumpPresident of the United States from 2017 to 2021, entered office with a significant number of judicial vacancies,[1][2] including a Supreme Court vacancy due to the death of Antonin Scalia in February 2016.

“As of February 3, 2020, the American Bar Association (ABA) had rated 220 of Trump's nominees. Of these nominees, 187 were rated "well-qualified," 67 were rated "qualified," and 10 were rated "not qualified."[10] Seven of the nine individuals rated as "not qualified" were confirmed by the Senate.[11]” (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_judicial_appointment_controversies#:~:text=As%20of%20February%203%2C%202020,were%20confirmed%20by%20the%20Senate.)

I also agree with Samantha Cyrulnik-Dercher’s opinion piece. “When Republicans brag about Trump’s 203 lifetime confirmations to the federal bench, we know what they’re really saying. They’re bragging about a disproportionately white male group of ideologues, many of whom were manifestly unqualified to serve as lifelong judges and to uphold the principle of equal justice under law. They’re boasting about a president who outsourced his responsibilities to extremist special interest groups like the Federalist Society and Heritage Foundation. 

“Trump and Senate Republicans like to claim that the president has chosen ‘highly qualified nominees,’ but the reality is this: many of Trump’s nominees have lacked the basic experience and temperament that should be required to be a federal judge.

“For example, one nominee to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Matthew Petersen, was so inexperienced they could not answer basic questions about legal procedure. During his confirmation hearing, after admitting that he had never tried a case or even argued a motion in state or federal court, he could not define a motion in limine, a motion frequently used at pretrial hearings and during trial in both state and federal courts. Petersen eventually removed himself from consideration for the judgeship, but the White House stood by him even after that, accusing opponents of distracting from the presidents ‘record-setting success on judges.

“Sadly, this is the record Trump has said on judges, he is nominated the highest number of individuals who the nonpartisan American Bar Association (ABA)’s standing committee on federal judiciary found to be not qualified because of their lack of relevant legal and judicial experience. Nine of Trump’s picks received this not qualified rating-a record indeed, but not the kind anyone should want to boast about.” (https://civilrights.org/blog/the-truth-about-trumps-judges/)

Our Gemara takes an extremely bad opinion over appointing unfit judges.  Reish Lakish says: With regard to anyone who appoints over the community a judge who is not fit, it is as though he plants a tree used as part of idolatrous rites [ashera] among the Jewish people, as it is stated: “You shall make judges and officers for yourself” (Deuteronomy 16:18), and juxtaposed to it, it is written: “You shall not plant yourself an ashera of any kind of tree” (Deuteronomy 16:21). By implication, appointing unfit judges is akin to planting a tree for idolatry. Rav Ashi says: And in a place where there are Torah scholars, it is as though he planted the tree next to the altar, as it is stated: ‘You shall not plant yourself an asherabeside the altar of the Lord your God.’

The difference between a good judge and a bad judge couldn’t be starker. A good judge causes God’s holy presence, the Shekhina, to dwell amongst us while a bad judge is akin to idolatry.

No comments:

Post a Comment