Wednesday, December 3, 2025

Why carry around heavy emotional baggage? #Vayishlakh#parashathashavua#devartorah

In college, my roommate studied William Shakespeare’s writing for a semester. The class required a giant textbook containing everything Shakespeare had ever written. The book weighed several pounds, and he had to carry it for hours at a time. Lugging that weight around caused his back to hurt, and it eventually broke a metal fastener on his bookbag.

Some things are just too heavy for us to carry. Emotional baggage from past hurt, for example, can weigh us down with bitterness and hatred. But God wants us to have freedom through forgiving people and, when possible, reconciling with them. The deeper the pain, the longer this may take. That’s okay. It took many years for Esau to forgive Jacob for stealing his birthright and blessing (Genesis 27:36).

When the two finally reunited, Esau graciously forgave his brother and even “embraced him” (33:4). Not a word was exchanged before they both burst into tears. Over time, Esau had let go of the anger that made him consider murder (27:41). And all those years gave Jacob the chance to see the magnitude of how he’d harmed his brother. He was humble and respectful throughout the reunion (33:8-11).

In the end, both brothers came to the place where neither required anything from the other (vv. 9, 15). It was enough to forgive and be forgiven and walk away free from the heavy baggage of the past. Wayne Chirisa wrote, “Reconciliation is not about forgetting, it’s about remembering without fear or vengeance.”

Why lug around heavy baggage?

 

 

 

 

Tuesday, December 2, 2025

Rava summarizes the rules of nullification Zevakhim 79

 

On today’s daf TB Zevakhim 79 Rava summarizes the rules of nullification in different kinds of mixtures. These rules will become more and more relevant when we study the laws of kashrut. “Rava says, in summary of these halakhot: The Sages said that the status of an item in a mixture is determined by the taste, i.e., if the taste of one substance is noticeable in a mixture with another substance it is not nullified, and the Sages said that a prohibited item is nullified by the majority, and the Sages also said that the status of an item in a mixture is determined by the appearance, i.e., if the appearance of a substance is recognizable in a mixture it is not nullified. Rava elaborates: With regard to a type of food mixed with food not of its own type, the nullification is determined by the taste (מִין בְשֶאֵינוֹ מִינוֹ בְטַעְמָא). In the case of a type of food mixed with food of its own type, the nullification is determined by the majority (מִין בְמִינוֹ  בְרוּבָא). In a case where there is a possibility to determine the status of an item based on appearance, the nullification is by appearance. (חֲזוּתָא  בְמַרְאֶה)” (Sefaria.org translation)

Rambam elaborates in his Mishneh Torah.

1.    מִין בְשֶאֵינוֹ מִינוֹ בְטַעְמָא “When a forbidden substance becomes mixed with a permitted substance of another type, [it causes it to become forbidden] if its flavor can be detected. When [a forbidden substance becomes mixed with a permitted substance of] the same type and it is impossible to detect [the forbidden substance] by its flavor, its presence becomes nullified if there is a majority [of the permitted substance].

“What is implied? When the fat of the kidneys falls into beans and becomes dissolved, the beans should be tasted. If the taste of fat cannot be detected, they are permitted. If [not only] the taste, [but also] the substance of the fat is present, they are forbidden according to Scriptural Law. If the flavor could be detected, but there is no substance, they are forbidden by Rabbinic Law…

(Obviously a Jew cannot taste mixture lest he actually taste the forbidden food and transgress the law of the Torah. One summons a Gentile to sample the mixture to see if he can taste the forbidden food. But generally we use the following rules of thumb-gg) Into what quantity [of a permitted substance] must a forbidden substance be mixed for it to be considered nullified because of its tiny proportion? [Each forbidden substance according to] the measure the Sages specified for it. There are substances that are nullified in a mixture 60 times its size (non sanctified food like a stew for tonight’s dinner-gg), others in a mixture 100 times its size (terumah-gg), and still others in a mixture 200 times its size. (kelayim and orlah-gg)” (Forbidden foods 15:1-2, 5) (Sefaria.org translation)

 

The Shulkhan Arukh poskins in Yoreh De’ah

 

2.    מִין בְמִינוֹ  בְרוּבָא “If the mixture is composed of two foods of the same nature  (like 2 types of meat, for example a kosher cut of meat and a nonkosher cut of meat -gg) and the pot is overturned in such a way that it is impossible to determine if the quantity of the permitted food was indeed sixty times greater than that of the forbidden food, if it was recognized before the accident that the permitted food made up the majority of the mixture, it is permitted; otherwise, it is forbidden.
GLOSS: Foods with the same name, although of different forms, are of the same nature; in this case, it is the similarity of name, not taste.” (88:1)
(Sefaria.org translation)

Rambam gives the example from our daf

3.    חֲזוּתָא  בְמַרְאֶה “A mikveh is not disqualified, neither because of a change of its water's taste, nor a change of its smell, only because its color changes. Any substance that may not be used to constitute a mikveh initially disqualifies one, if it causes its color to change.
What is implied? Wine, milk, blood, or other liquids that are classified as fruit juices do not disqualify a mikveh if three lugim of them fall into it, because it was only said that three lugim of drawn water disqualify a mikveh. They do, however, disqualify it if they change the color of its water.” Mishneh Torah, Sefer Toharah, Mikvaot 7:1)
(Sefaria.org translation)